On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:37:49 +0200 Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote:
[...] > Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of > suExec for the > WebGUI. > The WebGUI is actually doing two things: 1) reading data from DSPAM_HOME 2) executing the dspam binary To avoid suExec for (1) you need to have ALL data in the database. Not only quarantine. To avoid suExec for (2) you could add the web server user to be a trusted user. The WebGUI however would need to be much more complex if everything is in a database. The UI would need to implement direct access logic to the database. Right now the WebGUI is storage backend unaware. [...] > I know I know. I do my best to try and understand things, but it takes > time... and just > like everybody I guess, I wish days count more than 24 hours ;) > You know that my day is important too? I am doing so much work for DSPAM that I could invest better in private things. DSPAM is ultra time intensive. And I don't have any benefit doing that coding for DSPAM. Don't get me wrong. I am not asking for any benefit. It is just that from time to time I really ask my self: why and for who am I doing all this? > Cheers, > Julien > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
