On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:48:35 +0300, Jari Juslin <z...@iki.fi> wrote: > Kenneth Marshall kirjoitti: >> My one comment is that putting the signature in the message >> causes many, many more issues that putting it in just the >> mail headers. This example is just one. You can use the web >> interface to retrain the message as spam to prevent further >> messages from entering your INBOX. > > Thanks! > > Is there any way to initiate this behaviour from command line? > --signature= is the option you look for.
> I have > never actually tinkered the web interface to work, because I don't > like/need it... > > And yes, I second your opinion about DSpam sig being enough to be in the > headers. > If you use the small retraining script that I have added in GIT then you can use the signature where ever it is. Body, header, as an attachment, etc... it does not matter. > > -Jari > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-user mailing list > Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
