On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:42:54 +0300 Jari Juslin <z...@iki.fi> wrote: > Stevan Bajić kirjoitti: > > 10 years? DSPAM does not exist that long :) > > That's why I said "almost" ;-). > > > See? The whole message just has an attachment called latterly.rtf and DSPAM > > does not tokenize attachments. > > > > So you limit DSPAM to just be able to tokenize stuff it finds in the > > headers. I don't have show factors on and I add my signature just to the > > headers but for the test I am quickly going to turn them on. > > I understand that it is hard for DSpam to correctly classify messages > like that. > > But the bug is not about the classification; the bug is about DSpam not > finding the signature while it exists on both message body and the headers. > Risking to repeate my self again: Please post informations HOW you have implemented DSPAM in your setup? How do you pass that message back to DSPAM?
> > -Jari > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
