On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:54:59 -0700 Bradley Giesbrecht <bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:20:10 +0200 > > Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote: > > > >> Hi Stevan, > >> > >> Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 19:42 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : > >>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:27:27 +0200 > >>> news...@acrocat.com wrote: > >>> > >> [...] > >>> > >>>> This seems weird to me. > >>>> > >>> DSPAM does not keep track of changed states of a signature. So if > >>> you > >>> retrain the status is changed but if you undo that training then > >>> DSPAM > >>> does not know that you previously have already trained that > >>> message/signature. > >> > >> Unless I am wrong, the WebUI could know that it handles an already > >> retrained message, > >> > > Yes. You are right. The WebUI knows about it. > > What about non-WebUI retraining? > > It doesn't seem like the WebUI is the right place to keep track of this. > How do you undo a training when not using the Web-UI? > // Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
