On Aug 9, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:54:59 -0700 > Bradley Giesbrecht <bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:20:10 +0200 >>> Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Stevan, >>>> >>>> Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 19:42 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit : >>>>> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:27:27 +0200 >>>>> news...@acrocat.com wrote: >>>>> >>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> This seems weird to me. >>>>>> >>>>> DSPAM does not keep track of changed states of a signature. So if >>>>> you >>>>> retrain the status is changed but if you undo that training then >>>>> DSPAM >>>>> does not know that you previously have already trained that >>>>> message/signature. >>>> >>>> Unless I am wrong, the WebUI could know that it handles an already >>>> retrained message, >>>> >>> Yes. You are right. The WebUI knows about it. >> >> What about non-WebUI retraining? >> >> It doesn't seem like the WebUI is the right place to keep track of >> this. >> > How do you undo a training when not using the Web-UI?
I don't know. Send the same message to s...@domain.com and then h...@domain.com ? I haven't been using the Web-UI so don't really have much to add. I just use retrain addresses and look at the sql tables for stats. // Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
