Hi,

I am testing git version of dspam with PostgreSQL 9.0 running on
FreeBSD 8 (Dual core cpu, 4 GB memory)

I trained dspam with 110K spam and 50K ham mails. Now I have more than
7 million entry on dspam.

dspam=# SELECT count(*) from dspam_token_data ;
  count
---------
 7075311
(1 row)

I vacuum and reindex database regularly.

When I start the dspam, processing an email tooks 40-50 sec at the
beginning than drops to 10sec.
If I made this test with more powerful server(quad core cpu with 16GB
memory). it takes 0.01 secs.
I belive that the problem with the small server about large database
entries. but I would like to get better performance
on the small server as well. Any idea?

Do you think that sqlite might be better then pgsql on this setup? or
did I train dspam with alots of spam/ham?

Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to