On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:01:41 +0300 Ibrahim Harrani <ibrahim.harr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stevan, > Hello Ibrahim, > It is very nice to see you in the list after the long time. > Sure, I trust you and I can provide you spam/ham mails. But how many > mails do you need? :) > whatever you give me or whatever you want to train. It's up to you. You can give me all you have. If I can choose then give me as much Ham as you can. > After running the following query my database size became 70MB. > > DELETE FROM dspam_token_data WHERE innocent_hits < 10 AND spam_hits < 10 > Well... you just deleted data that could be good. I don't know your DSPAM configuration so I can not fully judge if this was clever or not? > Now dspam process the mail less then one second. > I also added many IgnoreHeader entries to dspam.conf from > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/dspam/index.php?title=Working_DSPAM%2BPOSTFIX%2BMYSQL%2BCLAMAV_Setup_by_PaulC > LOL. Those are headers I once added into Paul's configuration. Currently I use those IgnoreHeader entries: IgnoreHeader Accept-Language IgnoreHeader Approved IgnoreHeader Archive IgnoreHeader Authentication-Results IgnoreHeader Cache-Post-Path IgnoreHeader Cancel-Key IgnoreHeader Cancel-Lock IgnoreHeader Complaints-To IgnoreHeader Content-Description IgnoreHeader Content-Disposition IgnoreHeader Content-ID IgnoreHeader Content-Language IgnoreHeader Content-Return IgnoreHeader Content-Transfer-Encoding IgnoreHeader Content-Type IgnoreHeader DKIM-Signature IgnoreHeader Date IgnoreHeader Disposition-Notification-To IgnoreHeader DomainKey-Signature IgnoreHeader Importance IgnoreHeader In-Reply-To IgnoreHeader Injection-Info IgnoreHeader Lines IgnoreHeader List-Archive IgnoreHeader List-Help IgnoreHeader List-Id IgnoreHeader List-Post IgnoreHeader List-Subscribe IgnoreHeader List-Unsubscribe IgnoreHeader Message-ID IgnoreHeader Message-Id IgnoreHeader NNTP-Posting-Date IgnoreHeader NNTP-Posting-Host IgnoreHeader Newsgroups IgnoreHeader OpenPGP IgnoreHeader Organization IgnoreHeader Originator IgnoreHeader PGP-ID IgnoreHeader Path IgnoreHeader Received IgnoreHeader Received-SPF IgnoreHeader References IgnoreHeader Reply-To IgnoreHeader Resent-Date IgnoreHeader Resent-From IgnoreHeader Resent-Message-ID IgnoreHeader Thread-Index IgnoreHeader Thread-Topic IgnoreHeader User-Agent IgnoreHeader X--MailScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-AV-Scanned IgnoreHeader X-AVAS-Spam-Level IgnoreHeader X-AVAS-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-AVAS-Spam-Status IgnoreHeader X-AVAS-Spam-Symbols IgnoreHeader X-AVAS-Virus-Status IgnoreHeader X-AVK-Virus-Check IgnoreHeader X-Abuse IgnoreHeader X-Abuse-Contact IgnoreHeader X-Abuse-Info IgnoreHeader X-Abuse-Management IgnoreHeader X-Abuse-To IgnoreHeader X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info IgnoreHeader X-Accept-Language IgnoreHeader X-Admission-MailScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-Admission-MailScanner-SpamScore IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-Alert IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-Hold IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-Modified IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-PenPals IgnoreHeader X-Amavis-PolicyBank IgnoreHeader X-AntiVirus IgnoreHeader X-Antispam IgnoreHeader X-Antivirus IgnoreHeader X-Antivirus-Scanner IgnoreHeader X-Antivirus-Status IgnoreHeader X-Archive IgnoreHeader X-Assp-Spam-Prob IgnoreHeader X-Attention IgnoreHeader X-BTI-AntiSpam IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Bayes IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Spam-Flag IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Spam-Report IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Spam-Status IgnoreHeader X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned IgnoreHeader X-BeenThere IgnoreHeader X-Bogosity IgnoreHeader X-Brightmail-Tracker IgnoreHeader X-CRM114-CacheID IgnoreHeader X-CRM114-Status IgnoreHeader X-CRM114-Version IgnoreHeader X-CTASD-IP IgnoreHeader X-CTASD-RefID IgnoreHeader X-CTASD-Sender IgnoreHeader X-Cache IgnoreHeader X-ClamAntiVirus-Scanner IgnoreHeader X-Comment-To IgnoreHeader X-Comments IgnoreHeader X-Complaints IgnoreHeader X-Complaints-Info IgnoreHeader X-Complaints-To IgnoreHeader X-DKIM IgnoreHeader X-DMCA-Complaints-To IgnoreHeader X-DMCA-Notifications IgnoreHeader X-Despammed-Tracer IgnoreHeader X-ELTE-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details IgnoreHeader X-ELTE-SpamScore IgnoreHeader X-ELTE-SpamVersion IgnoreHeader X-ELTE-VirusStatus IgnoreHeader X-Enigmail-Supports IgnoreHeader X-Enigmail-Version IgnoreHeader X-Evolution-Source IgnoreHeader X-Extra-Info IgnoreHeader X-FSFE-MailScanner IgnoreHeader X-FSFE-MailScanner-From IgnoreHeader X-Face IgnoreHeader X-Fellowship-MailScanner IgnoreHeader X-Fellowship-MailScanner-From IgnoreHeader X-Forwarded IgnoreHeader X-GMX-Antispam IgnoreHeader X-GMX-Antivirus IgnoreHeader X-GPG-Fingerprint IgnoreHeader X-GPG-Key-ID IgnoreHeader X-GPS-DegDec IgnoreHeader X-GPS-MGRS IgnoreHeader X-GWSPAM IgnoreHeader X-Gateway IgnoreHeader X-Greylist IgnoreHeader X-HTMLM IgnoreHeader X-HTMLM-Info IgnoreHeader X-HTMLM-Score IgnoreHeader X-HTTP-Posting-Host IgnoreHeader X-HTTP-UserAgent IgnoreHeader X-HTTP-Via IgnoreHeader X-Headers-End IgnoreHeader X-ID IgnoreHeader X-IMAIL-SPAM-STATISTICS IgnoreHeader X-IMAIL-SPAM-URL-DBL IgnoreHeader X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM IgnoreHeader X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO IgnoreHeader X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS IgnoreHeader X-Info IgnoreHeader X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered IgnoreHeader X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result IgnoreHeader X-KSV-Antispam IgnoreHeader X-Kaspersky-Antivirus IgnoreHeader X-MDAV-Processed IgnoreHeader X-MDRemoteIP IgnoreHeader X-MDaemon-Deliver-To IgnoreHeader X-MIE-MailScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-MIMEOLE IgnoreHeader X-MIMETrack IgnoreHeader X-MMS-Spam-Filter-ID IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Forest-RulesExecuted IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthDomain IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Journal-Report IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Original-Scl IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Original-Sender IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalArrivalTime IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-OriginalSize IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Quarantine IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL IgnoreHeader X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult IgnoreHeader X-MS-Has-Attach IgnoreHeader X-MS-TNEF-Correlator IgnoreHeader X-MSMail-Priority IgnoreHeader X-MailScanner IgnoreHeader X-MailScanner-Information IgnoreHeader X-MailScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-Mailer IgnoreHeader X-Mailman-Version IgnoreHeader X-Mlf-Spam-Status IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Checker-Version IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Flag IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Level IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Report IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Route IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Rules IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-NAI-Spam-Threshold IgnoreHeader X-NEWT-spamscore IgnoreHeader X-NNTP-Posting-Date IgnoreHeader X-NNTP-Posting-Host IgnoreHeader X-NetcoreISpam1-ECMScanner IgnoreHeader X-NetcoreISpam1-ECMScanner-From IgnoreHeader X-NetcoreISpam1-ECMScanner-Information IgnoreHeader X-NetcoreISpam1-ECMScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-NetcoreISpam1-ECMScanner-SpamScore IgnoreHeader X-Newsreader IgnoreHeader X-Newsserver IgnoreHeader X-No-Archive IgnoreHeader X-No-Spam IgnoreHeader X-OSBF-Lua-Score IgnoreHeader X-OWM-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-OWM-VirusCheck IgnoreHeader X-Olypen-Virus IgnoreHeader X-Orig-Path IgnoreHeader X-OriginalArrivalTime IgnoreHeader X-Originating-IP IgnoreHeader X-PAA-AntiVirus IgnoreHeader X-PAA-AntiVirus-Message IgnoreHeader X-PGP-Fingerprint IgnoreHeader X-PGP-Hash IgnoreHeader X-PGP-ID IgnoreHeader X-PGP-Key IgnoreHeader X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint IgnoreHeader X-PGP-KeyID IgnoreHeader X-PGP-Sig IgnoreHeader X-PIRONET-NDH-MailScanner-SpamCheck IgnoreHeader X-PIRONET-NDH-MailScanner-SpamScore IgnoreHeader X-PMX IgnoreHeader X-PMX-Version IgnoreHeader X-PN-SPAMFiltered IgnoreHeader X-Posting-Agent IgnoreHeader X-Posting-ID IgnoreHeader X-Posting-IP IgnoreHeader X-Priority IgnoreHeader X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details IgnoreHeader X-Qmail-Scanner-1.25st IgnoreHeader X-Quarantine-ID IgnoreHeader X-RAV-AntiVirus IgnoreHeader X-RITmySpam IgnoreHeader X-RITmySpam-IP IgnoreHeader X-RITmySpam-Spam IgnoreHeader X-Rc-Spam IgnoreHeader X-Rc-Virus IgnoreHeader X-Received-Date IgnoreHeader X-RedHat-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-RedHat-Spam-Warning IgnoreHeader X-RegEx IgnoreHeader X-RegEx-Score IgnoreHeader X-Rocket-Spam IgnoreHeader X-SA-GROUP IgnoreHeader X-SA-RECEIPTSTATUS IgnoreHeader X-STA-NotSpam IgnoreHeader X-STA-Spam IgnoreHeader X-Scam-grey IgnoreHeader X-Scanned-By IgnoreHeader X-Sender IgnoreHeader X-SenderID IgnoreHeader X-Sohu-Antivirus IgnoreHeader X-Spam IgnoreHeader X-Spam-ASN IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Check IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Checked-By IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Checker IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Checker-Version IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Clean IgnoreHeader X-Spam-DCC IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Details IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Filter IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Filtered IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Flag IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Level IgnoreHeader X-Spam-OrigSender IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Pct IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Prev-Subject IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Processed IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Pyzor IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Rating IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Report IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Scanned IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Status IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Tagged IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Tests IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Tests-Failed IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Virus IgnoreHeader X-Spam-Warning IgnoreHeader X-Spam-detection-level IgnoreHeader X-SpamAssassin-Clean IgnoreHeader X-SpamAssassin-Warning IgnoreHeader X-SpamBouncer IgnoreHeader X-SpamCatcher-Score IgnoreHeader X-SpamCop-Checked IgnoreHeader X-SpamCop-Disposition IgnoreHeader X-SpamCop-Whitelisted IgnoreHeader X-SpamDetected IgnoreHeader X-SpamInfo IgnoreHeader X-SpamPal IgnoreHeader X-SpamPal-Timeout IgnoreHeader X-SpamReason IgnoreHeader X-SpamScore IgnoreHeader X-SpamTest-Categories IgnoreHeader X-SpamTest-Info IgnoreHeader X-SpamTest-Method IgnoreHeader X-SpamTest-Status IgnoreHeader X-SpamTest-Version IgnoreHeader X-Spamadvice IgnoreHeader X-Spamarrest-noauth IgnoreHeader X-Spamarrest-speedcode IgnoreHeader X-Spambayes-Classification IgnoreHeader X-Spamcount IgnoreHeader X-Spamsensitivity IgnoreHeader X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK IgnoreHeader X-TERRACE-SPAMRATE IgnoreHeader X-TM-AS-Category-Info IgnoreHeader X-TM-AS-MatchedID IgnoreHeader X-TM-AS-Product-Ver IgnoreHeader X-TM-AS-Result IgnoreHeader X-TMWD-Spam-Summary IgnoreHeader X-TNEFEvaluated IgnoreHeader X-Text-Classification IgnoreHeader X-Text-Classification-Data IgnoreHeader X-Trace IgnoreHeader X-UCD-Spam-Score IgnoreHeader X-User-Agent IgnoreHeader X-User-ID IgnoreHeader X-User-System IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Check IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Checked IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Checker-Version IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Scan IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Scanned IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Scanner IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Scanner-Result IgnoreHeader X-Virus-Status IgnoreHeader X-VirusChecked IgnoreHeader X-Virusscan IgnoreHeader X-WSS-ID IgnoreHeader X-WinProxy-AntiVirus IgnoreHeader X-WinProxy-AntiVirus-Message IgnoreHeader X-Yandex-Forward IgnoreHeader X-Yandex-Front IgnoreHeader X-Yandex-Spam IgnoreHeader X-Yandex-TimeMark IgnoreHeader X-cid IgnoreHeader X-iHateSpam-Checked IgnoreHeader X-iHateSpam-Quarantined IgnoreHeader X-policyd-weight IgnoreHeader X-purgate IgnoreHeader X-purgate-Ad IgnoreHeader X-purgate-ID IgnoreHeader X-sgxh1 IgnoreHeader X-to-viruscore IgnoreHeader Xref IgnoreHeader acceptlanguage IgnoreHeader thread-index IgnoreHeader x-uscspam > PS: I think this training issue a big problem for new comers. We need > a good document about the training. > It's hard to explain how to train well without explaining a bunch of mathematical concepts. Most users are simple thinking that more training is equal to better result. And this is definately not true. Clever training is the key. My little application was born exactly because of this. I needed a way to automatically train my DSPAM instance without supervision from a Spam honeypot and from normal mail outbound without overlearning DSPAM. > If I learn it very well, I am planning to write a document. > Thanks. > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:24:28 +0300 > > Ibrahim Harrani <ibrahim.harr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Kenneth, > >> > > Hello Ibrahim, > > > > > >> Thanks for your prompt reply. > >> Yes this is from single user. But I am planning to use this user as a > >> global that will be managed by admins. > >> I trained all spam with the same --username. > >> I change fillfactor to 90 after the training, not at the beginning. > >> but this did not solve the problem. > >> > >> Algorithm graham burton > >> Tokenizer chain > >> > >> What do you suggest about number of traning ham/spam mails. > >> Does 2K mail enough? I trained dspam with TEFT option. After the > >> training I switch to TOE in dspam.conf > >> I would like to reduce database size(currently 600MB) without loosing > >> spam catch rate. > >> > > I don't know how open you are for suggestions? If you trust me then I would > > like to get hold of the data you used for the training. If you can compress > > the Spam/Ham and make it available for download, then I would like to offer > > you to do the training for you. I would do the training with my own > > developed application that does the training differently then the stock > > DSPAM training application. The end result can be consumed with stock > > DSPAM. So after the whole training I would just export the data from > > PostgreSQL and compress it and make it available to you. > > > > I am confident that the different training method will result in much less > > data then stock DSPAM training method while having at least equal catch > > rate (in my experience the catch rate will be better). > > > > Unfortunately I can not release that training application because I have > > made some change to stock DSPAM and that training application uses new > > functionallity not available in stock DSPAM. > > > > Anyway... if you are open minded then let me know where I can download the > > training data and I will do the training. I promisse that I will NOT use > > the data for anything other then the training. I don't think that the Spam > > part is sensitive but the Ham part sure is. But you have my word that I > > will not reuse that data or redistribute that data. > > > > > >> > >> Here is the debug log. As you see there is a 22 second delay between > >> "pgsql query..." line and BNR pattern. > >> It seems dspam spends during the database query. > >> > > Crazy. The query is just around 11K. That's nothing. And you run that on a > > 4GB system? This should be enough. DSPAM is not that memory hungry. > > > > > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:25 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:25] Processing body > >> token 'visit' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:25 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:25] Finished > >> tokenizing (ngram) message > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:25 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:25] pgsql query length: > >> 11051 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:25 2011 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:47 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:47] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.00_0.05_' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:47 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:47] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.05_0.30_' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:15:47 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:15:47] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.05_0.30_0.10_' > >> > >> > >> Tue Mar 29 15:23:32 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:23:32] Finished > >> tokenizing (ngram) message > >> Tue Mar 29 15:23:32 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:23:32] pgsql query length: > >> 11023 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:23:32 2011 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:23:41 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:23:41] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.00_0.05_' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:23:41 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:23:41] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.05_0.30_' > >> > >> > >> > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:08 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:08] Processing body > >> token 'org"' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:08 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:08] Finished > >> tokenizing (ngram) message > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:08 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:08] pgsql query length: > >> 28271 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:08 2011 > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:48 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:48] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.00_0.50_' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:48 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:48] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.00_0.50_0.10_' > >> Tue Mar 29 15:35:48 2011 1112: [03/29/2011 15:35:48] BNR pattern > >> instantiated: 'bnr.s|0.50_0.10_0.15_' > >> > > Really strange. 40 seconds between query and BNR? This is way to much time. > > > > If you trust me regarding the Ham data then I would be very much > > interessted to see how low I can go with the space usage and still maintain > > a high accuracy? After all you don't have anything to loose. And you could > > save your current data and then switch inside dspam.conf from one database > > instance to the other and see which one has better accuracy or use your > > current dspam.conf and switch with the one I would provide you to use with > > the dataset I produced and then compare the result. > > > > Are you open minded for such a small experiment? Just let me know. > > > > > > > >> Thanks. > >> > > -- > > Kind Regards from Switzerland, > > > > Stevan Bajić > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Kenneth Marshall <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:45:39AM +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I am testing git version of dspam with PostgreSQL 9.0 running on > >> >> FreeBSD 8 (Dual core cpu, 4 GB memory) > >> >> > >> >> I trained dspam with 110K spam and 50K ham mails. Now I have more than > >> >> 7 million entry on dspam. > >> >> > >> >> dspam=# SELECT count(*) from dspam_token_data ; > >> >> Â count > >> >> --------- > >> >> Â 7075311 > >> >> (1 row) > >> >> > >> >> I vacuum and reindex database regularly. > >> >> > >> >> When I start the dspam, processing an email tooks 40-50 sec at the > >> >> beginning than drops to 10sec. > >> >> If I made this test with more powerful server(quad core cpu with 16GB > >> >> memory). it takes 0.01 secs. > >> >> I belive that the problem with the small server about large database > >> >> entries. but I would like to get better performance > >> >> on the small server as well. Any idea? > >> >> > >> >> Do you think that sqlite might be better then pgsql on this setup? or > >> >> did I train dspam with alots of spam/ham? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Hi Ibrahim, > >> > > >> > Are these 7 million tokens for a single user? What tokenizer are you > >> > using: WORD, CHAIN, MARKOV/OSB, MARKOV/SBPH? That seems like an awful > >> > lot of training. The docs usually recommend 2k messages each of ham > >> > and spam. When we generated a base corpus for our user community, > >> > we pruned the resulting millions of tokens down to about 300k. Another > >> > thing that can help is to cluster your data on the uid+token index. > >> > It looks like you cannot keep the full active token pages in memory > >> > with only a 4GB system. Look at your paging/swapping stats. You may > >> > be able to reduce your memory footprint which should help your > >> > performance. > >> > Do you have your FILL FACTOR set to allow HOT updates? > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Ken > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dspam-user mailing list > >> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > > _______________________________________________ > > Dspam-user mailing list > > Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
