On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:39:23AM CET, "Nathanael D. Noblet" <nathan...@gnat.ca> said: > On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote: > > The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora package > > for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work. > > Hello, > > I'm the fedora package maintainer for dspam. I didn't enable it > because I was under the impression that it was easier to put clamav into > the pipe of possible mail 'filters' outside of dspam. Enabling it also > makes dspam *require* clamav, and not everyone would want that. If there > was some way of having dspam enable/dynamically load clamav support so I > could make it a sub-package I think that would probably be the best > solution if you ask me. Any thoughts on that feasibility? > > I use clamav as a filter but it isn't through dspam.
Same thing for me : I use clamav as a milter, which allows me to reject the virus. dspam is too late in the chain for doing this, since mail is already accepted when it gets to dspam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
