On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:39:23 -0800, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote: >> The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora >> package >> for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work. > > Hello, > > I'm the fedora package maintainer for dspam. I didn't enable it > because I was under the impression that it was easier to put clamav > into > the pipe of possible mail 'filters' outside of dspam. Enabling it > also > makes dspam *require* clamav, > *require* is a strong word. Enabling clamav support in DSPAM does not require ClamAV at all. All it does is enable code that is capable to send to a TCP/IP socket some data and act on the result. That is all what the clamav code is doing in DSPAM. You don't even need to have ClamAV installed when you compile DSPAM.
> and not everyone would want that. If there > was some way of having dspam enable/dynamically load clamav support > so I > could make it a sub-package I think that would probably be the best > solution if you ask me. Any thoughts on that feasibility? > > I use clamav as a filter but it isn't through dspam. -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
