On 13/12/11 23:04, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Den 13. des. 2011 20:07, skrev Håkon Alstadheim:
>> Den 18. nov. 2011 10:11, skrev Igor Smitran:
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> My setup is this:
>>>
>>> postfix:25>   dspam>   postfix:2525>   dovecot-lmtp>   user mailbox
>>>
>>> for incoming mail dspam is only marking message as spam in header.
>>> During delivery sieve filter moves message to Spam if it founds dspam
>>> tag in header.
>>>
>>>
>>> for outgoing emails dspam is quarantining mail. Since all users are
>>> inside one group admin can use webui to retrain dspam in case of an error.
>>> And there is my problem.
>>>
>>> When admin tries to retrain dspam by clicking "Deliver checked" error
>>> occures. In my postfix maillog i can see:
>>>
>>> warning: Illegal address syntax from localhost[127.0.0.1] in RCPT
>>> command:<????????>
>>>
>>> Looks like dspam interprets email wrong because something is wrong in
>>> group managing inside dspam.
>>>
>>> If groupname is for example "GLOBAL" error would be
>>>
>>> warning: Illegal address syntax from localhost[127.0.0.1] in RCPT
>>> command:<????AL>
>>>
>>> If groupname is for example "TE" error would be
>>>
>>> warning: Illegal address syntax from localhost[127.0.0.1] in RCPT
>>> command:<????????>
>>>
>>> my group file looks like this:
>>> nl:shared,managed:*,@my_domain.tld
>>>
>>> In dspam there are only two virtual users - nl and my_domain.tld
>>>
>>> Or maybe dspam-webui is to be blamed, i don't know :(
>>>
>>> server is scientific linux 6.1 - dspam is installed from epel repo:
>>> dspam-libs-3.10.1-1.el6.i686
>>> dspam-web-3.10.1-1.el6.i686
>>> dspam-mysql-3.10.1-1.el6.i686
>>> dspam-3.10.1-1.el6.i386
>>> dspam-client-3.10.1-1.el6.i686
>>>
>>> I hope someone will be able to reproduce this.
>> Did you get anywhere with this problem ? Had a couple of mails today in
>> quarantine that disappeared (recently upgraded to 3.10.1). I have this
>> in my mail.log:
>> ---
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: warning: Illegal address
>> syntax from localhost[127.0.0.1] in RCPT command:<>
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo dspam[4085]: Got error 501 in response to RCPT TO:
>> 501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: disconnect from
>> localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> localhost[127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.1<     n...@alstadheim.priv.no>: Recipient
>> address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table; from=<>
>> to=<????n...@alstadheim.priv.no>  proto=SMTP helo=<localhost>
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo dspam[4087]: Got error 550 in response to RCPT TO:
>> 550 5.1.1<     n...@alstadheim.priv.no>: Recipient address rejected: User
>> unknown in local recipient table
>> Dec 13 15:25:33 garbo postfix/smtpd[4086]: disconnect from
>> localhost[127.0.0.1]
>>
>> ---
>> My mail address is<hakon@...>, not<     n@...>.
>>
>>
> Got some more logging going, and there is nothing wrong with the 
> command-line I'm giving to dspam, but postfix is seeing a DIFFERENT 
> garbled RCPT TO for each test. Something is randomizing memory on the 
> way. I'd post my /etc/dspam/dspam.conf, but it is a bit of an 
> embarassing mess. Dspam is clearly attempting to deliver through this 
> part of my config though:
> ---
> DeliveryHost        127.0.0.1
> DeliveryPort        10025
> DeliveryIdent       localhost
> DeliveryProto       SMTP
> --
> I'm running dspam from debian squeeze-backports, version   Installed: 
> 3.10.1+dfsg-3~bpo60+1
> 

Hi Hakon,

Would it be possible to test whether dspam 3.10.0 (or wherever you
upgraded from, please specify) is able to deliver the exact same message
from quarantine?

I assume that you had issues delivering mail from quarantine before (and
tested that, opposed to 'never tried, but i guess it was working')?

--
Tom

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Systems Optimization Self Assessment
Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and 
improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization 
Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to