On 18/04/2012 20:45, Steve Fatula wrote:
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those users to receive a very low level of spam. DSPAM is used for some troublesome accounts or those that want/can handle training a filter. That's great, but I want it enabled.So, does no one else have any responses to help me with the hit rate? I see people have posted such questions in the past and got some good replies. I just don't see any for the hit rate that are useful.I just don't get why my hit rate is so very low, when I see numerous people with hit rates way above 90%. It's not proving as useful as I used to get years ago out of dspam. Perhaps later changes have made it less reliable?
Well, two people have responded and both say try TOE. I would change to TOE, clear the database and give it few days, report back. What is stopping you from trying that advice?
If you would like to try an older version then go ahead and download which ever version you like from GIT (http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi) and compile it.
All patches, feedback and comments welcome.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
