On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Steve Fatula wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Paul Cockings wrote: > >> On 18/04/2012 00:07, Steve Fatula wrote: >>> Have 10 users on this system, highest spam hit rate is 37%, which is >>> quite bad if you ask me. >> >> On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the >> checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those >> users to receive a very low level of spam. DSPAM is used for some >> troublesome accounts or those that want/can handle training a filter. > > That's great, but I want it enabled. > > So, does no one else have any responses to help me with the hit rate? I see > people have posted such questions in the past and got some good replies. I > just don't see any for the hit rate that are useful.
I can't help you other then to point out that you may have missed the two replies prior to the one you responded to, both of which suggested switching from 'TrainingMode TEFT' to 'TrainingMode TOE'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
