On 19/04/2012 10:28, Stevan Bajić wrote: > Sorry. My bad. It's late over here and I forgot about global > classification groups. So your group definition is okay. It's properly > configured for a global classification group.
That is alright. Thank you for replying and sharing your knowledge. So my case where my colleagues do not train dspam and I am the only one who trains dspam, is "global classification group" the right type group to use? P.V.Anthony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
