On 15/04/2012 19:08, Steve Fatula wrote:
Not really happy with my current hit rate:
TP True Positives: 59
TN True Negatives: 5529
FP False Positives: 4
FN False Negatives: 266
SC Spam Corpusfed: 0
NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 0
TL Training Left: 0
SHR Spam Hit Rate 18.15%
HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.07%
PPV Positive predictive value: 93.65%
OCA Overall Accuracy: 95.39%
Most spam is simply not caught. Most of the spam is even pretty
similar from my human eyes. So, since I had used dspam many many years
ago and remember fantastic accuracy, I must be doing something wrong.
This is on dspam 3.10.1
Here's my dspam.conf. Any ideas?
Hi Steve,
How is your DSPAM installation? Are you achieving a higher accuracy
now? Did changing to TOE make a big difference?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
