From: Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch>
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net" <dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Which was to be expected. TEFT is an evil relict from the past.
>>>
>>>
But it's the default! That makes no logical sense to me that the devs won't
change the default! I am sure I get the reason, but, I would tend to disagree
with it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
I know, I know, I know. I am still waiting for Tom's blessing allowing me to
change the default :)
>
>The reality of the situation is this... When someone uses a new (to them)
>product, like dspam, they cannot possibly take months of time to fully analyze
>how it works, what all it does, etc. So, what you typically do, is, leanr what
>you can, and, mostly take defaults assuming that the designers of the software
>are picking the normally better settings. When I download and install
>software, it typically works that way. Sure, there are some things you can
>tune better as you have more experience with it, but, by and large, it's
>mostly good.
In this case, you have a setting which can really kill the performance of the
software. And, not trivial in that if you change it, you almost have to start
over. I don't think that's a good thing. It's just not a setting you change,
and, overnight, things work better. There's more to it.
And that is why I believe you should change the default. That's not to say
there are not places where teft may well work better. It may. But, I am telling
you something you already know.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
