Hi Tom,

Thank you for your feedback (again).

On 06/11/2013 02:47 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
[snip]
>
> I run dspam per user after postfix has resolved the aliases. That means
> that all messages are sent to DSPAM all aliases are handled by Postfix
> (and result in 'patr...@example.org'). It depends on the way you patch
> dspam and postfix together, but if you use dspam as a content filter
> (i.e. post-queue), this should work fine. Any reason not to do that?

I would indeed prefer that DSPAM just uses patr...@example.org and have 
no reason not to do that. I'm using the "Advanced content filter 
example" from http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html It's working 
great now after I figured out that receive_override_options = 
no_address_mappings prevents alias expansion and that removing it would 
be a good idea :)

[snip]
> If you want to do alias handling within dspam, you'll need to add the
> aliases. Maybe you already have the aliases in a table (or sql view)
> that you can use (configure in MySQLVirtualTable or similar), depending
> on your storage backend.

Since it's working now I will stick with that. But good to know there's 
another way that should work.

Thank you for your help. Much appreciated.

Regards,
Patrick

ps re postfix list msg about the retrain script not working: it seems it 
needs a DSPAM signature in the body which I do not have.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to