Hi Ken, That's not a bad idea, but for the time being we just want to upgrade to fix the period escaping issue. Can 3.10.2 use the existing database without any changes in accuracy or classification?
-J On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:27:17PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Has anyone attempted an upgrade of 3.6.8 to 3.10.2? We've got a >> sizable token database. Our configuration is: >> >> Algorithm: graham burton >> P-Value: graham >> >> MySQL backend. Ubuntu 10.04 >> >> >> Just curious if there are any gotchas to watch out for. Thank you in advance. >> >> -J >> > > Hi Jason, > > One of the biggest improvements is the ability to use the OSB tokens and > their greatly increased accuracy as well as that due to the new tokenizer > support for HTML Email. You really ought to consider using some sort of > parallel training process to bring the new tokenizer/OSB online and not > just use the old data as is. > > Regards, > Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
