Hi Ken, That pretty much tells me what I need to know. Thank you!
-J On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:33 PM, k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I think that tokens for non-HTML are the same so you would have > minimal effects on accuracy. Since HTML is processed differently, > you accuracy could change based on what tokens are currently > being used to categorize a message. You could run a comparision > by using the same tokens with the new version over already processed > messages and see how they compare. I would want to validate that > before going live. > > Regards, > Ken > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:09:25PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >> Hi Ken, >> >> That's not a bad idea, but for the time being we just want to upgrade >> to fix the period escaping issue. Can 3.10.2 use the existing database >> without any changes in accuracy or classification? >> >> -J >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
