On 07.01.2018 21:05, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any
more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better
choice.
It's a shame, because besides this one false positive i can't retrain,
dspam is basically perfect in it's spam classification.
Can it be that the user (shell user) with the one you call the binary is
not in the list of trusted list. Can you look into dspam.conf and list
the entries starting with "Trust".
Can you as well enable debugging in dspam.conf?
I would love to see your configuration. If you don't want to send it
here to the mailing list, maybe you can send it to me directly?
i don't need all
the bells and whistles of these other projects. Do you know why people
lost interest in dspam? i can't help to refactor it, i don't know enough
c/c++. IOW, is there anything that could be done to revive it from the
dead?
I have not written that it is dead.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user