On 01/07/2018 03:35 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> On 07.01.2018 21:05, ITwrx.org wrote:
>> On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
>>> You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any
>>> more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better
>>> choice.
>> It's a shame, because besides this one false positive i can't retrain,
>> dspam is basically perfect in it's spam classification.
> Can it be that the user (shell user) with the one you call the binary
> is not in the list of trusted list. Can you look into dspam.conf and
> list the entries starting with "Trust".
root, dspam and vmail are all included in trust entries. i just re-ran
as all three users and they all failed to find the signature. i run
dspam as the vmail user normally due to the various outdated tutorials i
cobbled together to arrive at my config.
>
> Can you as well enable debugging in dspam.conf?
i added --debug to my systemd service file but idk if arch package was
configured with debug support or not. i don't know what the line in
dspam.conf should be.
>
> I would love to see your configuration. If you don't want to send it
> here to the mailing list, maybe you can send it to me directly?
sure.
>
>
>>   i don't need all
>> the bells and whistles of these other projects. Do you know why people
>> lost interest in dspam? i can't help to refactor it, i don't know enough
>> c/c++. IOW, is there anything that could be done to revive it from the
>> dead?
> I have not written that it is dead.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to