On 01/07/2018 03:35 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: > On 07.01.2018 21:05, ITwrx.org wrote: >> On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote: >>> You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any >>> more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better >>> choice. >> It's a shame, because besides this one false positive i can't retrain, >> dspam is basically perfect in it's spam classification. > Can it be that the user (shell user) with the one you call the binary > is not in the list of trusted list. Can you look into dspam.conf and > list the entries starting with "Trust". root, dspam and vmail are all included in trust entries. i just re-ran as all three users and they all failed to find the signature. i run dspam as the vmail user normally due to the various outdated tutorials i cobbled together to arrive at my config. > > Can you as well enable debugging in dspam.conf? i added --debug to my systemd service file but idk if arch package was configured with debug support or not. i don't know what the line in dspam.conf should be. > > I would love to see your configuration. If you don't want to send it > here to the mailing list, maybe you can send it to me directly? sure. > > >> i don't need all >> the bells and whistles of these other projects. Do you know why people >> lost interest in dspam? i can't help to refactor it, i don't know enough >> c/c++. IOW, is there anything that could be done to revive it from the >> dead? > I have not written that it is dead.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user