Under postfix the typical deployment for dspam is to set it up as a
content_filter.
dspam has more than one way to score spam (eg: chi-square, markov) which I've
been told shouldn't be mixed (eg: CRM114 + chi-square).
If (here's the question...)
I were to set up a chi-square content_filter on port 10020 and send all spam
through that first with the option to quarantine or deliver to port 10021
AND
I were to set up a CRM114 markov content_filter on port 10022 and send all
spam through that deployment with the option to quarantine or deliver
to port 10023
Would dspam work or kind of self destruct... ?
eg:
postfix--> dspam/bayes --> postfix -->dspam/CRM114 -->postfix --> lmtp
This is what I would like to do...
Now, here's the reasons why I would do this twice:
bayes is largely effective.
bayes is much faster than CRM114.
CRM114 is also effective but slightly different.
It is my opinion that multiple different approaches is a good thing to do. This
is frequently seen with multiple spam scanning tools implimented (bogofilter,
spamassassin...)
If I could do this using dspam in both methodologies than I would have a single
point of quarantine and management.
What are the chances that I could do this without doing data integrity damage or
suffering other inconsistencies in performance?
