On Jan 15, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
What are the chances that I could do this without doing data
integrity damage or suffering other inconsistencies in performance?
If it had been such a good idea, don't you reckon that Jonathan
(who after all wrote dspam in the first place) would have
"stumbled" on it long ago?
Tonni, are you really as irritating in person as you are when you're
hiding behind your keyboard?
If you don't have anything relevant to offer the conversation, don't
post. Your signal:noise ratio is very, very poor these days.
As for the original question, you'd need to manage two sets of
quarantines and history for each user, which might end up being a bit
much. You'd also need to tweak dspam a bit to manage parallel
databases.
- Mark
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out my JustRacing Home Page at:
http://www.justracing.com/homepage/mdadgar
