Felix Schwarz wrote, on 11. mar 2007 00:19: [...]
The only difference between both machines is that 3.6.8 starts catching spam after 5 runs while 3.4.9 does not. However, I don't want to switch to DSPAM 3.6 right now (this should be done *after* the new servers are working).
Then don't bleeding well complain or ask for any help: why in heaven's name do you think that Jonathan didn't stop developing dspam at 3.4.9? Though I admit my initial 2.9 worked very well and was my reason for staying with dspam, but I wouldn't ask for help with it on this list.
My dspam 3.6.8/CVS/MySQL 4.1.21 rigs get 99+% of all (yes, *all*, including giffies, jpegs or whatever graphics) spam with no false positives after sufficient training - even without initial seeding.
Whenever I see that people are using hash, sqlite or other "funny" DB backends I normally immediately mark the thread as read. In this instance I didn't, since I found the problem as reported so pathetic.
If your problem is with install standardization (you need quick, standard installs to Linux FHS locations) and you run Red Hat Fedora or RHAS/RHEL and want dspam rpms, then I can give you either rpms or srpms (for SuSE I cannot help). Otherwise, update to 3.6.8 or CVS (there isn't much difference, a couple of bug fixes).
Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
