The Anarcat wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:41:12PM +0000, Paul Cockings wrote:
The most important bit to start is the new project name. Any suggestions welcome (Mine aren't very creative)
dspam-new?
Follows amavis' convention so has some value there. Otherwise I'm generally against -new (what happens when it's not new any more? The name stops making sense!)
open-dspam?
Suggests that dspam wasn't, which is unfair to JD
Did sensory network buy the name, and are we therefore forced to change
it?
I think it needs changing anyway to avoid confusion, although I'd be very surprised if the name was not sold.
"dspam-community"?
Some merit in that one I think, but it sounds like a good name for a dspam wiki/forum rather than a name for the project.

But then I can't think of anything better which is no help at all.

Personally (subject to what others come up with in the next few hours) I think dspam-new is good as a temporary name with the goal of a less rushed new name to come in the short to medium term. But let's not get bogged down on the name (and logo/web design/etc), it's the code that matters!

--
Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0845 45 89 555
Registered in England (0456 0902) at 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG

Reply via email to