> Hello again!
>
> I've finally fixed some of my problems with DSpam, but was wondering if
> anyone could help with another query.
>
> Basically, I have a setup which is hosting mail for lots of user (around
> 50 domains and a total of 2000 email addresses are seen by dspam). Not
> everyone is going to train the filter as simple put: they won't. So a
> core group of us will be training it and then I plan to use dspam_merge
> to merge this data into a globaluser which is part of a merged group.
> This seems to be the right way to go, but then, everyone's own database
> is being trained from mail it sees. So for a user who is not training
> DSpam, it might flag lots of emails as not spam, thus eventually provide
> poor spam catching.
>
> For instance if a user gets 100 emails through with the word 'casino' in
> it, which are all spam but dspam doesn't know this yet, then dspam will
> increase the innocent count on 'casino', thus eventually providing poor
> accuracy down the line.
>
> Is it that I should be using TOE for the people who arn't part of the
> core group of trainers? Is that the correct answer?
>
> Just trying to get my head around DSpam - I think it's great, and I just
> want to get it working as best as possible.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> From - Wed
It sounds like you would want the "notrain" mode
>From the README:
notrain: No training. Do not train the user's data, and do not keep
totals.
This should only be used in cases where you want to process
mail for
a particular user (based on a group, for example), but don't want
the user to accumulate any learning data.
David
!DSPAM:1011,4952454c150924352620472!
