Beg to differ, Nate.

I know you computer gurus are all gaga about the world-wide call sign 
routed [Nextel Direct-Talk] D-Star model, but from the point of view 
of an Emergency Management Agency, we have no interest in having one 
of our communications resources tied to the entire planet during a 
local emergency.

We might be interested in regional networking or access from the State 
EOC - it depends on the circumstances.

Actually, if D-Star really takes off, it is inevitable that there is 
no way everyone will play together and there will be separate 
networks, subnetworks, connect & disconnect on demand, or whatever 
turns out to be the evolution of things.

New ideas don't automatically mean BETTER ideas.  For proof just look 
at the glitzy, state-of-the-art, digital dashboard in the 84 
Corvette.  Others tried it too.  Look into any car today - what do you 
see?  Good old fashioned analog readouts.  People found that the old 
model works best.  

The new technology stayed in the dashboards - all those dials are 
microprocessor driven - but the new technology was refined to work the 
way the users want it to work. Likewise, new technology will be part 
of amateur radio's future - but the user interfaces - and the 
architecture of the systems that we use will be driven by what meets 
amateur radio needs.

It's easy to see the attraction of the call sign routed model - it is 
an attraction for existing hams, particularly computer oriented hams, 
to be able to do things that ham radio could never do before - but is 
it an attraction to potential new hams???

We should be careful here - if we want there to be amateur radio in 
the future - it may not be a real good idea to evolve the "product" 
into a poor imitiation of the same thing any 16 year old can get at a 
the local mall for $29/month.

-------------------------------------------------------------

--- In [email protected], Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  for local Nets.

"...Trying to cram D-STAR with it's USER-routed model with all-the-
time linking via Gateways into the older Net Command and Control 
model, is  probably a mistake.

 I think over time we will all TRY to use the old models, but they'll  
fall apart, ..."

Reply via email to