Thanks Nate!

Your response and sense of humor is appreciated!
Bill

--- In [email protected], "Nate Duehr" <n...@...> wrote:
>
>  
> 
> Answers below.
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Bill Powell
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:11 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Coordinating DD mode "repeaters"
> 
>  
> 
> Scott and Group,
> 
> As VP Coordination for the ARCC I have been asked by a number of our users
> to consider establishing a STRICTLY VOLUNTARY coordination program for DD
> and other digital "non-repeater" modes.
> 
> 
> 
> All coordination is "voluntary", Bill.  :-)
> 
>  
> - Can a DD channel be shared in the same manner as an AX.25 system?
> 
> Likely to degrade rapidly.  Proper use of callsigns by users would make it
> technically POSSIBLE, but problematic.  Until 1.2 GHz is "full" it's
> probably better to spread them out.
> 
> 
> - Does DD perform CMSA or is it a "blind" system?
> 
> If it's like other D-STAR implementations by Icom, it can only "hear"
> D-STAR.  So it would probably not transmit if other D-STAR signals are
> present, but would jump right on top of an analog or other signal "sharing"
> the frequency.  Ultimately someone would have to go test this, or get an
> answer from Icom on it.
> 
> 
> - Does DD operate on a single channel or can it be operated on a "split"
> (pair) of channels? How is it "normally" used?
> 
> Single channel.  Very wide.
> 
> 
> - What is the definition of "interference" in a DD system?
> 
> The same as any system, something that keeps communications from occurring!
> (GRIN)
> 
> 
> - What is the result of "interference"?
> 
> Packet loss.  The system behaves like a wireless access point, if that
> helps.
> 
> 
> - What level of interference is "tolerable"
> 
> Personally I find the whole system would be mathematically too slow to use
> beyond 5 local users anyway at 128 Kb/s -- so my personal opinion would be
> "any interference" would render the system even slower, and "unusable" in
> most cases.  
> 
> 
> - What is the "true" (measured) receiver sensitivity for a DD central
> station and at what BER?
> 
> Good luck getting this from the manufacturer, let alone the Amateurs that
> own the systems.
> 
> Nate WY0X
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to