> there is already a broken terminal entry without a module identifier. You > should delete this first, and then use it as mentioned in my last mail.
This is not a problem. There is such an entry for K5CTX which I entered for testing, and everything still works fine. > I think the problem is with the non existing terminals for PY2KCA. That's a good pickup, and that will certainly affect G2 operations (callsign routing), but I don't think that will affect dplus linking. So far as I know, and Robin can jump in here anytime, dplus is driven by sync_gip for linking IP addresses, not sync_mng. I can link W5HAT^^A to W5LM^^^A and neither have A terminals defined. But, we'll see. 73 -- John
