A much more applicable comparison would be to look at testing of P25 digital 
voice radios versus testing of D-Star radios.

In fact, as you note, many tests on digital capable radios are the same as the 
tests performed on analog FM transceivers.  This also applies to radio 
alignment.  For example, the Motorola Astro Spectra and XTS series radios have 
a number of alignments which must be performed so that the radio will operate 
optimally in both analog FM and digital voice systems.  All of these alignments 
can be performed with traditional analog test instrumentation.

However, alignment is one thing, performance verification is quite another.  
The P25 standard defines many tests which verify the performance of these 
radios in digital mode. [See TIA-102.CAAA-B and TIA-102.CAAB-B]

Some of these tests are undoubtedly of more interest to manufacturers than to 
end users, but many are important in the field.  Examples would be modulation 
fidelity, reference sensitivity, BER and so on.  The importance of these tests 
resulted in the development of digital service monitors such as the General 
Dynamics R2670 and the IFR/Aeroflex 2975.

Unlike your DPL example, receiver IF charistics for analog FM and digital voice 
operating modes may very well be different, even in the same radio.  This 
affects receiver sensitivity, IM rejection, co-channel and adjacent channel 
rejection, etc.

These characteristics ARE of significant interest to those who service and 
support digital systems - if they were not - no one would buy the digital 
service monitors.

Amateurs are also interested in these radio performance parameters, 
particularly those who are interested in the development of band plans [channel 
spacing, frequency re-use, etc.]and those who want to implement repeater 
systems that perform optimally.

Unfortunately, the D-Star standard does not appear to contain any provision for 
making tests in the digital domain.  So, if I want to verify the effective 
receiver sensitivity and desensitization of a P25 digital repeater - with a 
laptop, service software, and a digital service monitor, I can do just that.

If I want to verify the performance of a D-Star repeater - operating in its 
native digital mode - I can't.

Although there was a product announcement from Aeroflex with respect to testing 
of D-Star radios - that referenced an autotest software package to be developed 
for Icom.

There are two things that are significant about that.  If you contact Aeroflex, 
you will find that the announcement really only refers to an agreement.  No 
product exists at this time nor is there even a set of functions defined yet.

Second, it is probable that the auto alignment of the Icom radios - just as the 
alignment of Motorola P25 radios - really only adjusts certain analog 
parameters.

Hopefully, Icom and Aeroflex go beyond that to include some sort of digital 
mode tests but don't look for that product any time soon.

---------------------------------------------------------------------


--- In [email protected], "Steven Samuel Bosshard (NU5D)" 
<bossh...@...> wrote:

"Motorola developed Digital Coded Squelch (their Digital Private Line or DPL) 
in band subaudible selective squelch system. 
...
Much like DSTAR, radio servicing stayed the same.    

...Rf and IF amps were the same given the operating bandwidths involved.  The 
only big difference was testing the squelch 

...Much applies to a DSTAR radio.  ..."

Reply via email to