I SAY LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS. IT WORKS FINE. I don't understand why to want to stop them from going to the reflector
Fran <http://www.miele-family.com/weather> <http://www.miele-family.com/weather> _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 9:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Wouldn't It Be Nice ? On Aug 7, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Steve Bosshard wrote: > It seems with so much brain power floating around out there that > linking software could screen the sending station's UR and either > unlink or send a call progress tone from the repeater letting the > person making the call know something is amiss or not send the call > to the reflector. > Don't need call progress tones. Don't need anything fancy. If D-Plus would simply refuse to send any packets to links or Reflectors with anything other than "CQCQCQ" in the UR field, the problem would be solved. I've requested this before, and been ignored. It's a *really easy fix* that allows both callsign routing and Reflectors to live in relative harmony, and only requires the end user to put in the same ol' CQCQCQ they'd use to talk locally. Kinda not worth the effort to type this e-mail though, Robin's just not interested for whatever reason. Wasting my time pointing out the obvious again... -- Nate Duehr, WY0X n...@natetech. <mailto:nate%40natetech.com> com http://facebook. <http://facebook.com/denverpilot> com/denverpilot http://twitter. <http://twitter.com/denverpilot> com/denverpilot
<<image001.gif>>
