On Aug 9, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Fran wrote: > > I SAY LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS. IT WORKS FINE. I don’t understand why > to want to stop them from going to the reflector >
Duh. That's an easy one. It's so simple it appears to elude everyone. Because the people on the Reflector CAN'T TALK BACK without switching to a callsign route themselves. It's a basic tenant of digital communications... don't mix traffic types. So simple, yet so many naysayers... Like I've said before: A callsign route into ANY linked repeater on a Reflector, disrupts EVERY repeater on the Reflector in today's configuration. If that routed message weren't sent to the Reflector at all, but remained at the receiving Gateway, no disruption for anyone. And anyone on the Gateway being called can reply to the callsign route without having to unlink, to tell the person to join them on the Reflector. So simple. Even a cave man could do it. -- Nate Duehr, WY0X [email protected] http://facebook.com/denverpilot http://twitter.com/denverpilot ------------------------------------ Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the original message in reply unless needed for clarity. ThanksYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dstar_digital/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dstar_digital/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
