Robbie,

Let me make this observation. The DVDongle was originally written in Java to 
provide ease of programming and portability.

The overhead that it created was pretty high and is quite obvious when you 
compare the Java vs non-Java DVtool application.

D-STAR requires a real-time operating environment. You've got to be processing 
on a very consistent basis at a relatively high pace. With a full stack, it is 
possible that you could have 400kbps worth of data to process. And these aren't 
big Ethernet packets, they are a whole lot of itsy bitsy UDP packets.

In reality, a standard Linux kernel probably isn't the best solution, a RTOS or 
very small footprint Linux kernel is probably a much better choice. Something 
that runs in a classic router platform is a sooo much better design than a 
dedicated PC.

Ed WA4YIH

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Robbie De Lise
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Random Thoughts on an Open D-STAR Architecture 
[Was: Home Rptr is MIA, What do I do???]



Hi,

We have been thinking about some new dstar system too.

We had the following idea:

Our preferred language would be Java. I see in your code snipped that you 
prefer this too.
Let me (us) know what you think.

73s
Robbie ON4SAX

Reply via email to