Actually, my point was that the real way to drive down costs was for other manufacturers to jump into the ring. An open source alternate would be nice, but it wouldn't be "D Star" and having multiple implementations would likely not be a good thing for D Star in the long run.
73, Scott, N9AA --- In [email protected], "n9aa" <scott.man...@...> wrote: > > My point was that the cost of the current implementation isn't prohibitive > vs. the "codec2" implementation. Not too many people are not going to buy an > AMBE implemented D-Star radio because of the $13 difference between that and > yours. > > The "codec2" fantasy is an answer in search of a problem. > > 73, > Scott, N9AA
