On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Tony Langdon wrote:

At 04:39 AM 8/11/2010, you wrote:

Callsign routing probably would have gained traction earlier if the updates to gateways weren't so slow, but ircddb has solved this problem if gateway owners will just install it.

ircddb is certainly a huge improvement that makes callsign routing much more useful. However, I beg to differ as to how much traction it would gin in the long run. I see that callsign routing often suits a different scenario to what most hams actually do.

Callsign routing is at its best in a one on one scenario, especially when you're looking for a specific station (and even more so if ircddb is in use). However, many hams use wide area repeater networks for nets and ragchewing. For these applications, callsign routing is usually inferior to DPlus reflectors.

Normal callsign routing doesn't really accommodate (say) a net involving 3 or more gateways (where do you direct UR to so that everyone can hear you? Sure, there is the multicast feature, which is designed to do this, but this has two serious limitations in my book:

1. It requires administrator intervention on all participating gateways to setup. This is the big show stopper in my book, it lacks flexibility. Doable here in Australia, where the WIA runs most of the gateways, but bugging administrators in this way is not what most end users want to do, just to run a net, especially when it's a simple matter to link to a reflector (and for courtesy, ask ONE person, rather than several if they can hold their net there).

2. It puts demand on the upstream bandwidth of gateways. In most installations, this is the biggest bandwidth limitation, and not all gateways will comfortable support the upstream data rate (obviously those running DD ports _should_ be OK, unless running heavy DD activity at the same time). DPlus reflectors are generally installed in data centres with good bandwidth available.


Wide area linking has its place and I'm grateful that Robin added it to the toolbox. However, it also has its downside:

Links tend to be up for long periods of time, and local users are either unaware or don't consider the fact. I don't know how many times I've listened to local conversations between two hams 800 miles away, that have no interest to anyone but the two hams involved. I've even heard (for several hours) a US ham and a VK ham using reflector connected gateways as a personal intercom as they were working HF. (Not that having an "Intercom" running is an inappropriate activity, but it would be better to only involve the two repeaters and not the entire collection of gateways on the rather widely used reflector.) I've also noted in some of these situations that the operators don't leave gaps for others to get on their local repeaters or join the conversation ... sometimes delaying the ability to gracefully leave the reflector.

A net I participate in meets weekly and at least 3 repeaters automatically connect to the reflector for the network, but sometimes there are no net participants on those repeaters. Aside from just listening for pleasure, it may prevent people who aren't familiar with (or worse yet are restricted) linking from disconnecting.

One on one is a natural for callsign routing, especially if one of the participants doesn't know the location of the other. However, it would be possible to create network server software that used callsign routing rather than linking and would be much more flexible. How it would work is for everyone participating in the network would put the network "pseudo-callsign" in the URCALL field. The gateways would direct transmissions to the "pseudo-callsign" which is really a daemon running on a server on the D-STAR network, which would note the stations checking in and what gateways they were on. Every transmission to the "pseudo-callsign" would be repeated to all gateways with network members present. If a station moved from one repeater/gateway to another and keyed up, the network would add the new repeater/gateway to the list and repeat to it as well. Very dynamic, no "linking/unlinking" of gateways, it just uses the underlying native callsign routing.





John D. Hays
Amateur Radio Station K7VE
PO Box 1223
Edmonds, WA 98020-1223 VOIP/SIP: [email protected]

Reply via email to