It's especially odd that they've chosen to support the -h option, but not the -G option -- I'm not to what purpose one could put the generated header file. Perhaps the Apple folks could comment?
Adam On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:27:25AM -0500, Robert Lor wrote: > Anyone know why -G flag is not supported in the Dtrace port in Leopard? This > makes the dtrace cmd in Leopard incompatible with that on Solaris, and it's > already causing problem with PostgreSQL. > > -Robert > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:30:10 +0000 (GMT) > From: Lee Packham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [BUGS] BUG #3699: Fails to compile DTrace Support > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs > > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 3699 > Logged by: Lee Packham > Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.2.5 > Operating system: OSX Leopard > Description: Fails to compile DTrace Support > Details: > > I have built a patch to enable a working DTrace on OSX with Postgres 8.2.5. > Basically the problem is that the dtrace command on OSX doesn't have the -G > parameter - so you have to use the newer -h method to produce a header file. > > > I have put the patch on my blog. > > http://leenux.org.uk/dtrace-patches/dtrace-with-postgres-on-osx > > Hope this is of use to you guys. > > Cheers, > > Lee Packham > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > _______________________________________________ > dtrace-discuss mailing list > dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org -- Adam Leventhal, FishWorks http://blogs.sun.com/ahl _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org
