Adam Leventhal wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:08:58AM -0700, Steve Peters wrote: >> The Mac OS X "dtrace -h" emits all the information required for >> successfully linking a USDT probe by the rest of the toolchain. On Mac >> OS X "dtrace -G" is superfluous. For historical reasons "-G" was >> disabled early on in the bring up. We'll take a bug to re-introduce "- >> G" as a no-op with a warning message. >> >> See the section "BUILDING CODE CONTAINING USDT PROBES" in the Leopard >> dtrace(1) man page. >> >> Static probes work very nicely on Mac OS X (thank you!) A number of >> our frameworks ship with "Is Enabled" static probes in Leopard. > > Steve, > > That's terrific (and my apologies for doubting your DTrace implementation > even for a second)! Was this done by making modifications to your linker > or gcc perhaps? > > And congratulations to you and your colleagues on the port of DTrace to > Mac OS X. We hope to hear from you all much more now that it's in the > wild. > > Adam >
I would like to say congratulations and thank you as well. I just did my first DTracing on my iMac today. Once I get my MacBook Pro updated, then life will be complete - I will have DTrace capability on everything I use ;) Thanks, Jarod _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org
