On 10/7/05, dandantheitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ICANN is fine in its current location, there is no where better for it > to go. The USA has given control of ICANN over a to a private group > with an international board. The USA does have veto power over the > board, which it has, as of date, never used.
But they have! Recently, the .xxx top level domain was being considered, but President Bush stepped in and asked ICANN to not approve it. Whether .xxx TLD was a good idea or whether it was a bad idea, Bush has shown that he'll use politics with ICANN. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/19/triple_x_domain_delayed/ -todd ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/0XFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
