> So it is indeed showing a migration path to Solaris, if i understand
> correct .. ?
This was a greenfield installation, so there was no 'migration' involved
from a full production environment, they just moved their code to
Solaris, which was trivial as it was all either open source based gnu
stuff or easily portable from design.
Manu Abraham wrote:
> Christopher Saul wrote:
>> But Adel, the point here is not that Andreesseon is comparing Solaris on
>> Sparc, a different platform entirely, but Solaris on Opteron, the same
>> platform the commercial Linux he evaluated, so the performance arguments
>> disappear.
>>
>>
>
> From the link, Chris posted ..
>
> What did Marc Say?
>
> * We originally planned to use Linux on Intel commodity hardware
> * Solaris is a better Linux than Linux
> * Solaris has similar economic and OpenSource advantages as Linux
> * It's very easy to move from Linux to Solaris
> * Solaris 10 reliability is a very big deal for us
> * Sun is now riding aggressive side of the price/performance curve
> * With Sun hardware, we know everything has been tested and
> integrated together
> * With Solaris, we know if we need vertical scalability, we'll
> actually be able to get it
>
>
>
> So it is indeed showing a migration path to Solaris, if i understand
> correct .. ?
>
>
> Manu
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Christopher Saul
Engagement Architect, Desktop & RFID
Sun Microsystems SEE
Mobile: +971 50 650 7041
Office: +971 4 366 2634
Ext: x12634
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
