Oracle's closed source...
Standards based in many ways certainly, but nowhere near open source.
Chris
Nadeem M. Khan wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 17:47, vishweshwar rao wrote:
>> for a
>> complete reliable solution you always need proprietry
>> products
>
> Define "proprietry". If by that term you mean "closed source", I
> disagree with your statement. I won't go at length discussing the merits
> of open source over closed as it is now an established fact.
>
> If you think open source products have no support, then you're wrong
> again. RH and Suse provide much better support than M$. Mind telling me
> whats wrong in using RH/Suse for critical applications like Oracle or
> mail?
>
> Regards,
> NMK.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Christopher Saul
Engagement Architect, Desktop & RFID
Sun Microsystems SEE
Mobile: +971 50 650 7041
Office: +971 4 3662634
Ext: x12634
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
