On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:28 -0500, Augie Fackler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:10 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> I wonder why bitbucket Hg mirror of Dulwich was brought down from the > >> list or repositories on http://samba.org/~jelmer/dulwich/ ? > >> It would be convenient to submit patches there. I wonder if patches > >> applied to Bitbucket mirror could be brought back to Git? > > That repository was maintained by somebody else and it wasn't being kept > > up to date, so I removed it from the list in order to prevent confusion. > > > > Patches applied to the bitbucket mirror could certainly be brought back > > to Git, but I'd prefer it if somebody else would maintain that mirror > > and forward the patches upstream in a Git-compatible format (git > > repository that can be merged, git-am-style patches or just a set of > > unified diffs). > I'm perfectly willing to maintain a bitbucket mirror, Thanks :-)
> <shameless plug> but why not just use hg-git? I do all my dulwich dev > work using hg-git and it's fantastic. > </shameless plug> Well, I already use bzr-git for my Dulwich work and am very happy with that. :-) I'd rather keep the amount of things that can go wrong when I publish Dulwich limited. > FWIW, modern hg can use 'hg email --plain' to email git-am format > patches. Some day, I'll take the time to teach git-am about hg's > slightly more robust patch format. I'm working on adding support for reading git-am patches to Dulwich, that might be of use in hg-git as well. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
