On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:54 -0500, Augie Fackler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:28 -0500, Augie Fackler wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@samba.org> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:10 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> >> I wonder why bitbucket Hg mirror of Dulwich was brought down from the > >> >> list or repositories on http://samba.org/~jelmer/dulwich/ ? > >> >> It would be convenient to submit patches there. I wonder if patches > >> >> applied to Bitbucket mirror could be brought back to Git? > >> > That repository was maintained by somebody else and it wasn't being kept > >> > up to date, so I removed it from the list in order to prevent confusion. > >> > > >> > Patches applied to the bitbucket mirror could certainly be brought back > >> > to Git, but I'd prefer it if somebody else would maintain that mirror > >> > and forward the patches upstream in a Git-compatible format (git > >> > repository that can be merged, git-am-style patches or just a set of > >> > unified diffs). > >> I'm perfectly willing to maintain a bitbucket mirror, > > Thanks :-) > > > >> <shameless plug> but why not just use hg-git? I do all my dulwich dev > >> work using hg-git and it's fantastic. > >> </shameless plug> > > Well, I already use bzr-git for my Dulwich work and am very happy with > > that. :-) I'd rather keep the amount of things that can go wrong when I > > publish Dulwich limited. > Right, I'm just questioning why we'd keep a mirror when there's a > perfectly good tool available that could pull right from the real > repo. Isn't that just one way of creating the mirror? There'd have to be a cronjob or something to do the pull though, and somebody needs to make sure the versions of dulwich/hg/hg-git in use there stay working.
> >> FWIW, modern hg can use 'hg email --plain' to email git-am format > >> patches. Some day, I'll take the time to teach git-am about hg's > >> slightly more robust patch format. > > I'm working on adding support for reading git-am patches to Dulwich, > > that might be of use in hg-git as well. > hg already natively imports git-format patches (with a caveat that we > have a bug I need to investigate about gpg-signed patches). Ah, cool. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users Post to : dulwich-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
