THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#159 - Unification of common flux variables capabilities User who did this - Bernd Flemisch (bernd) ---------- The work for the advective fluxes is almost done. A Darcy flux base class is introduced, all porous media box models in stable apart from 1p2c use it. Moreover, Philipp added a ForchheimerFluxVariables class. It is thus possible to exchange Darcy with Forchheimer by simply changing the BaseFluxVariables property. So why is it not yet used in the 1p2c model? If I understand it correctly, the 1p2c model should also work with two-phase fluid systems. A fixed phaseIdx is assigned to choose the correct phase from the fluid system. This phaseIdx cannot be known in the general flux variables. There, numPhases would be set to 1, and only the quantities for phase 0 would be calculated. If the phaseIdx of the 1p2c model is different from 0, it would give wrong results. If we want to keep the possibility of having 2p fluid systems for the 1p2c model, I do not see a convenient way of using the general flux variables. Maybe someone else has an idea, maybe it\'s not so bad to keep it special. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=159#comment264 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
