Hello,
yes, sorry, so what I actually want to impose is that the normal
derivative of saturation at the right boundary is = 0 and as I
understand since, sw and sn are related, it doesn't matter which
saturation.
Regards,
Lorenzo
On 01.02.2019 12:12, Timo Koch wrote:
It’s unclear what you mean: dsn/n is not the flux of the non-wetting phase,
dsn/n=0 only means the capillary-pressure-driven part of the flux is zero.
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
