Dear Timo,
Thank you very much for the fix. It now works well on only on the
simplified problem, but also on my original setup with customary
boundary flux on the outflow.
It turned out that analytic derivatives help a lot with the convergence
as opposed to the numeric derivatives.
Best regards,
Dmitry
On 07.04.2020 14:35, Timo Koch wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
the fix is merged and backported to 3.1.
Timo
--
_________________________________________________
Timo Koch phone: +49 711 685 64676
IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430
Pfaffenwaldring 61 email: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
D-70569 Stuttgart url: www.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/en/lh2/
<http://www.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/en/lh2/>
_________________________________________________
On 7. Apr 2020, at 01:12, Timo Koch <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
have a look at
https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux/-/merge_requests/1952
It should fix the bug for tpfa and also another bug in the box method
implementation of the analytic Jacobian.
It also adds tests for the analytic Jacobian that pass against
reference solutions created with numeric Jacobian.
Thanks a lot for helping us improve DuMux! This is highly appreciated.
Best wishes
Timo
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
