Dear Dennis,
Thanks a million! The suggested case was a good guidance for
implementing an "outflow" BC. It worked.
Best,
Gergely
Am 26.05.2020 um 12:44 schrieb Dennis Gläser:
Dear Gergely,
as far as I see it, this should not be possible because the problem's
neumann() function is actually called from the local residual because
the result of computeFlux() is not defined on Neumann boundary faces.
Instead of evaluating computeFlux(), the local residual requests the
user to substitute the flux term with the Neumann boundary condition
values for that face.
Are you trying to achieve some sort of outflow boundary condition?
This you could do manually as shown, for instance, in
test/porousmediumflow/1pnc/implicit/1p2c/isothermal (as far as I know).
Best wishes,
Dennis
On 25.05.20 18:46, Gergely Schmidt wrote:
Dear Dumux community,
is it possible to call
dumux/porousmediumflow/compositional/localresidual.hh/computeFlux in
a 2p2c implicit box problem's neumann function in Dumux 3.1?
Many thanks! Best regards,
Gergely Schmidt
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
--
***********************************************************
Gergely Schmidt M.Sc.
Wissenschaftl. Mitarbeiter
Institut für Strömungsmechanik und Umweltphysik im Bauwesen
Leibniz Universität Hannover
Appelstr. 9 a
30167 Hannover
tel +49 (0) 511 / 762 4205
***********************************************************
_______________________________________________
Dumux mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
