Wow, my fault for trusting Apple's words again! :P  I should
know better: I've got a 6100 with 134MB RAM, when Apple and 
everyone else lists the max as 72MB.

You didn't have to use any special tricks to fool the installer?


Kris Feldmann

Thus wrote "Scott Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:36:25 -0400
> From: "Scott Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Duo/2400 List)
> Subject: [Duo2400] Re: Duo230
> 
> Actually, I have mine running 8.1 quite nicely. As long as it has at least
> 24 megs of RAM it will do very nicely.
> 
> http://www.brochner.com/bornagain
> 
> Spiffy stuff :)
> 
> Scott Holder
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kris Feldmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Duo/2400 List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:04 PM
> Subject: [Duo2400] Re: Duo230
> 
> 
> > I forgot to add that the Duo230 will not run an OS
> > newer than 7.6.1 (this is a good thing in my oppinion),
> > which limits you to partitions of 2GB each (or is it 4GB?).
> > You'll have to use several partitions if you get a large
> > new IDE drive with an IDE-SCSI converter.
> >
> > Kris Feldmann


----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>

To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Need help from a real person? Try.  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

----------
Dr. Bott  | 10/100 Ethernet for your 2400 is finally here!
MPC-100   | <http://www.drbott.com/prod/mpc100.html>

NineWire          | If they are cool enough to host this list...
Digital Solutions | ...you should check them out! http://www.NineWire.com/

Midwest Mac Parts  ][  <http://www.midwestmac.com>  
After-market parts  for Macs.   ][  888-356-1104 ][

MacResQ Specials: LaCie SCSI CDR From $99! PowerBook 3400/200 Only $879! 
Norton AntiVirus 6 Only $19! We Stock PARTS! <http://www.macresq.com>

Reply via email to