On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Daniel May wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I own a 280c and am considering to change it for a 2300 (good
> offer at ebay Germany - have a look if you want: www.ebay.de).
> My question: I was assuming that the resolution of the 2300
> was actually BIGGER than that of the 280c, but I looked at the
> Apple specs and found that the resolution is exactly the same :
> 640 x 480 px. Can anybody comment on that? 2300 owners: do you
> think the upgrade is worth it?
The screen IS bigger, but the resolution is the same.
I used to have a 2300c but sold it. I've since gotten a 280 (I'm typing
on it now!) and for what I do it's just as fast if not faster.
I use mostly 68K programs (Word 5.1 especially) and the 2300c seemed
sluggish. I think SpeedDoubler would have helped.
The 280 runs 8.1 nicely. If you need to run PPC-only programs the 2300
is your only choice. If not, it's not a huge speed improvement.
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>
Dr. Bott LLC | Get a LapBottom with new �GRIPPIER� gripper pads!
| http://www.drbott.com/prod/lapbot.html $23.00
Midwest Mac Parts <http://www.midwestmac.com> | After-market parts
for Macs. Fix your ticking dock for $59 w/ trade-in of PS. 888-356-1104
PowerBook Guy is | Click here!
Everything PowerBook! | http://www.powerbookguy.com
