any reason why not to file it in the public archives? ..ede On 19.05.2014 13:13, Kenneth Loafman wrote: > Just moving the discussion back to duplicity-team. > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Terry <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 18 May 2014 13:29, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > manual duplicity works on full, collection-status but fails on > incremental call > > > Noted. > > > > The second error there looks similar, in the sense that a get() > call failed to download the file. I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x that > look similar. > > > > don't believe it to be a lingering bug from 0.6 > this is reproducable only with 0.7 branch against an account that i > can use properly w/ 0.6.x , reproducably ;P > > > My brain was thinking of bugs 1177381 and 710198. But yeah, this error > is different. > > I'll have a look later. > > -mt > > _______________________________________________ > Duplicity-talk mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
