try a full and then an incremental.. that's where it dies reproducably for me.. see thread ;) .. ede
On 19.05.2014 14:50, Kenneth Loafman wrote: > BTW, webdav(s) works to rsync.net <http://rsync.net>, for me, on 0.7. > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:38 AM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > this was off-topic.. again webdav related which makes sense on the list. > time for a new thread i guess. > i agree wrt. testing though.. ede > > On 19.05.2014 13:24, Kenneth Loafman wrote: > > They all get filed somewhere. > > > > We started with duplicity-team and this is not a topic that would hold > a lot of interest for the general user. > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:16 AM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > any reason why not to file it in the public archives? ..ede > > > > On 19.05.2014 13:13, Kenneth Loafman wrote: > > > Just moving the discussion back to duplicity-team. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Terry <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > > > > > > On 18 May 2014 13:29, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > > > > > > manual duplicity works on full, collection-status but > fails on incremental call > > > > > > > > > Noted. > > > > > > > > > > The second error there looks similar, in the sense that > a get() call failed to download the file. I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x > that look similar. > > > > > > > > > > don't believe it to be a lingering bug from 0.6 > > > this is reproducable only with 0.7 branch against an > account that i can use properly w/ 0.6.x , reproducably ;P > > > > > > > > > My brain was thinking of bugs 1177381 and 710198. But yeah, > this error is different. > > > > > > I'll have a look later. > > > > > > -mt > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Duplicity-talk mailing list > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> > Post to : [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
