Follow-up Comment #5, bug #24027 (project duplicity):

I agree. That's the point where I figured I must be missing something.
Hopefully the case is not that in fact duplicity's incrementals are broken,
which would be very un-nice :(

I never followed up before. Since you're looking into it now I'll hold off a
while longer.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?24027>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
Duplicity-tracker mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-tracker

Reply via email to